Against Hypocrisy

Jeremiah 7:9-10. “Will you steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, make offerings to Baal, and go after other gods that you have not known, and then come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, ‘We are delivered!’-only to go on doing all these abominations?”

Ellen Degeneres

The other day I heard that JC Penney hired Ellen Degeneres as a spokeswoman for their company.  There is a group called One Million Moms that is trying to get JC Penny to fire Ellen Degeneres by declaring a boycott of the store for their lack of support for traditional values.

As a Bible Christian, I do believe that homosexuality is a sin and that marriage is the 1^st human institution ordained by God and is to be between one man and one woman.  I also believe that the effort on the part of One Million Moms reeks of coldhearted bigotry.

I think that what bothers me the most is the fact that when the homosexual lobby in the American political landscape talks about inequality and injustice, on  of the most common complaints is that people can and do get fired for nothing less than their sexual orientation and now there is a group out there that is going to prove them right.

I would hope that the followers of Christ, those that have experienced the grace and salvation of our Lord, would not forget the fact that they didn’t deserve grace, mercy, love and redemption anymore than anyone else who is lost in their sin.

I think that this effort to try to strong-arm a secular company and have them fire someone based solely on their homosexuality is wrong minded and ungracious.  We need to treat all people with the respect, honor, love, and dignity that they deserve as image bearers of God.  We must also remember that the world is going behave like the world; we are in this world but not of it.  We need to stop trying to get the world to conform to Kingdom standards; don’t confuse the two kingdoms!

Challenging the Powers of Death with the Gospel of Life

John Ensor|6:00 AM CT

I have learned something in recent years. People come to cherish words like atonement and justification when you expose them to other words like bloodguilt and reckoning.

I’ve tried to teach gospel-centric words effectively as stand-alone concepts. It has produced a few amens, yet lives were not radically altered toward God and the good works he has prepared for us to do. I was serving coffee at breakfast, rather than arriving with cool water as people fled from within a burning building. Then I came to understand two things that altered my life and my preaching, two things that expose the terrible thirst that the gospel addresses.

First, I came to understand the meaning of bloodguilt according to the Bible. Bloodguilt is God’s term of indictment for the shedding of innocent blood.¹ Bloodguilt reflects God’s intention to vindicate each precious life—created in his own glorious image—and to avenge innocent lives cut down. For such things there is a reckoning (Lev. 24:17).

According to Deuteronomy 21, the shedding of innocent blood leaves everyone in the community under bloodguilt. Those who actively shed blood are guilty. Those who watch it or take no steps to stop it are guilty. Even if you can pray, “Our hands did not shed this blood, nor did our eyes see it shed” (Deut. 21:7), the whole community is still under bloodguilt. An act of atonement is required (Deut. 21:8). Only then will the bloodguilt be “purged” (Deut. 21:9).

If someone you love is murdered, you have no trouble understanding the preeminent nature of this evil. Everything is affected. When a stranger is murdered (Deut. 21:1), you are apt to shrug, go to work, and believe things are not much affected. This is the corrupting lie. So God taught the Israelites that when innocent blood is shed, they should assemble on a prime piece of property, sacrifice a prime animal, and pray. This repoints the moral bricks of their community. They discover their earnest need for blood-atonement for their own bloodguilt. The blood of a heifer stands as a place marker, until God provides the better and lasting atonement.

Moral Courage

This leads to my second life-altering discovery. I came to see that abortion is the shedding of innocent blood on our own watch. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the research arm of Planned Parenthood, there are 42 million induced abortions worldwide every year. This figure has held fairly constant for 30 years. In the United States, only women older than 80 have lived through some or all of their child-bearing years in a time without legal and accessible abortion. Bloodguilt is arguably the most applicable word to assign to our time.

If this is true, if this is even close to true, how can we be silent? The cross is about the shedding of innocent blood!² Why not apply it to the sin of shedding innocent blood? Why let the Devil do all the talking! “You killed your baby,” he says. “God cannot forgive you.” Or to the struggling Christian, “I know your secret! Missions? Not you!”

Today, the Devil has people by the neck with their sexual sins and abortion. If we think of abortion as a merely political issue, we fundamentally misunderstand a defining reality of our times, and we fail to see that the cross alone can satisfy the just wrath of God for the shedding of innocent blood.

We have a word for this: propitiation! There is no forgiveness for the shedding of innocent human blood, except by the shedding of Christ’s innocent blood. He is our substitutionary sacrifice. We have a word for this, too: atonement! He covers over all our sins.

The same unbreakable principle of justice that condemns you prior to faith in Christ defends you going forward. God will always act justly. If he punished you in Christ for your bloodguilt, and paid the penalty in full, it would be wrong to punish you again for the same crime. If you put your faith in Christ and look to the cross as your own just punishment, even for the sin of shedding innocent blood, then God is justified in showing you his mercy. All has been paid. We have a word for this: justification!

Conscience of this Generation

We need to bring the main thing—the cross—to bear on the one thing that most plagues the conscience of this generation and hamstrings their service to God: the disaster of sexual sin that so often ends in the death of the weak and innocent. Tragically, many addressing the bloodguilt of abortion today offer a sprinkling of gospel on a plateful of Kübler-Ross. The abortion-recovery materials now in circulation tend to be anthropocentric, therapeutic Band-Aids over the wasting disease of the soul produced by abortion.

We need you, preachers and teachers. We need theologically rigorous instruction about the sufficiency of the gospel to cleanse away the bloodguilt of abortion and to reconcile us to God. Abortion needs to be called out by name, confessed with tears, and brought under a gospel that atones, justifies, propitiates, expiates, and brings us peace. And we need to remind our people to hold on to this gospel with all their might when the accuser comes at night.

——————————

1. Here, I do not mean innocent as a synonym for “sinless before God.” I mean harmless, pure, or free from guilt before our fellow man or the laws of man. Babies and little children, certainly, but adults too are called innocent when they are punished without due process, or on the basis of a false report, or to please the powerful, or because they have no proper defenders.
2. Christ was obviously innocent before God in ways no one else ever could be, but he was also innocent by the merely human definition.

John Ensor is author of Innocent Blood: Challenging the Powers of Death with the Gospel of Life (Cruciform Press, 2011). He is a leader in the rapidly expanding pregnancy help movement, known mostly for his multiple efforts to help Christian communities establish ultrasound-equipped clinics in the neediest neighborhoods of our major cities. He serves as executive director of global initiatives for Heartbeat International—initiating pregnancy help ministries in Asia and other un-reached areas. He blogs at Innocent Blood.

Can Authentic Faith Be Awakened by a Physical Miracle?

This post can be found at Desiring God Blog 

By John Piper | Dec 06, 2011 04:00 am

Did Jesus teach that miracles are useless for those who reject the word? Here’s the story he told:

From hades the rich man implored Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his five brothers not to come to that place of torment.

But Abraham said, “They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.”

The rich man said, “No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.”

Abraham disagreed: “If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.” (Luke 16:31)

God Must Open Eyes

Does this mean that miracles are useless among people who have biblical truth, but don’t believe it? Sounds like it: If the prophets haven’t converted them, a miracle won’t either.

But think of it this way. Thousands of people first learn what the Bible says and only later come to believe it. So for a season they “hear Moses and the Prophets” and don’t believe.

Then something happens. God touches the eyes of their hearts and they can see the truth and beauty of what they once rejected (2 Corinthians 4:6).

Eye-Opening Agencies

What agencies — what means — does God employ to do this? Peter says that one agency is always the word of God: “You have been born again through the living and abiding word of God” (1 Peter 1:23).

But other agents can have their part to play. Jesus said that our good works may so shine that people “give glory to our Father in heaven” (Matthew 5:16). He also said his miracles may have a role to play: “Believe on account of the works themselves.” (John 14:11).

So the point of Luke 16:31 (“If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead”) is not that God never uses miracles to convert sinners.

The point is that the person who remains blind to the word will remain blind to the miracle. But the person who sees the true meaning of the miracle will also see the true meaning of the word.

Some are awakened by the word alone. Others are awakened by the word confirmed by a miracle (Hebrews 2:4; Acts 14:3).

The Same Change of Heart

The key in making sense of Luke 16:31 is that the same change of heart that opens a person to the true meaning of a miracle also opens him to the true meaning of the word. So it is totally true that a person who rejects the divine meaning of the word will reject the divine meaning of the miracle.

And the test of any person who claims to believe because of a miracle will be that their heart embraces the truth of the word of God. If they love miracles and don’t love the word, they are in love with the mere power, not the purpose, of the miracle. They are what Jesus calls adulterous sign seekers (Matthew 12:39; John 6:2; 26; 7:3-5).

Always by Word, Often by Wonder

Therefore, Jesus would not discourage us from praying the way the early church did concerning the divine words and divine works:

Lord, . . . grant to your servants to continue to speak your word with all boldness, while you stretch out your hand to heal, and signs and wonders are performed through the name of your holy servant Jesus. (Acts 4:29–30)

God always quickens by his word (1 Peter 1:23), and often by the concomitant agency of  works.

Missions – Not From Strength But Weakness

Fom an article by Shane Lems in the May/June 2011 Modern Reformation Magazine comes this quote from British theologian and missionary Lesslie Newbigin (1909-1998).

“Missions will no longer work along the stream of expanding Western power.  They have to learn to go against the stream.  And in this situation we shall find that the New Testament speaks to us much more than does the nineteenth century as we learn afresh what it means to bear witness to the gospel from a positionn not of strength, but of weakness.

The Open Secret (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995)

“Anger is a Calling” by Paul Tripp

Don’t be afraid to be angry!  (From The Gospel Coalition Blog.)

Pope to the Jews?

“…if Peter’s apostleship had a peculiar reference to the Jews, let the Romanists see on what ground they derive from him their succession to the primacy. If the Pope of Rome claims the primacy because he is Peter’s successor, he ought to exercise it over the Jews. Paul is here declared to be the chief apostle of the Gentiles, yet they affirm that he was not bishop of Rome; and, therefore, if the Pope would establish any claim to his primacy, let him gather churches from among the Jews. He who by a decree of the Holy Spirit, and by the consent of the whole apostolic college, has been solemnly declared to be one of the apostles, cannot but be acknowledged by us in that character. Those who would transfer that right to Peter set aside all ordination, both human and divine. It is unnecessary to explain here the well-known metaphor in the words circumcision and uncircumcision, as applied to Jews and Gentiles.” (John Calvin’s Commentary on Galatians 2:9)

Notes From Sunday School

Notes from Sunday school – Book of Galatians 6 Nov 2011

 

1. Paul and Titus’ gospel to the Gentiles validated by Peter, James, and John
2. Peter’s actions by separating himself from the Gentiles during the agape feast, caused division and a rebuke from the Apostle Paul
3. There was much talk about what “justification” means and how does it relate to other theological terminology regarding salvation (i.e. are redemption, and sanctification, the same thing as justification? etc.)
4. Justification = legal pronouncement; being declared righteous based on Christ’s finished work
5. Christ provided complete satisfaction thereby we are declared righteous because of Christ’s righteousness imputed (applied) to us
6. Justification  is more than, “just as though I had never sinned”; justification is that, plus “just as though I had perfectly kept the law”

Notes from Sunday school – Book of Galatians 13 Nov 2011

1.  Some  more talk about Justification and Santification
2. Justification = indicative – Statement of fact
3. Sanctification = Imperative – Something that we do, or something that is a natural fruit of justification
4. The teacher warned against separating justification and sanctification too cleanly saying that justification and sanctification are so closely interwoven and dependent to separate to widely – I have some serious reservations about this approach – In my estimation, not having a clean enough separation between these 2 principles can cause the error of confusing the declaration of “justified” by grace alone and “justification” by works.  This is the error of the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrine of infused righteousness or of cooperation with the Holy Spirit to secure salvation.
5. 2 terms were brought up – “Positional sanctification” and “Progressive      sanctification”
6. Positional      sanctification = if we are truly “in Christ”, then we have been sanctified, are being sanctified, and are going to be perfectly sanctified. – this terminology came about because of Paul’s using the past tense of the word “sanctify” in some of his letters. (1 Corinthians 1:2 ESV)  “To the church of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all      those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours”, (1 Corinthians 6:11 ESV)  “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God .”, (Hebrews 2:11 ESV)  “For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have one origin. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brothers”
7. Progressive sanctification = ongoing progression in holiness
8. God creates what he commands – he creates righteousness through the Holy Spirit, but there is involvement required by us
9. There is a difference between “works of the law” and “works of righteousness”
10. Works of the Law – trying to keep the law as a means of justification
11. Works of Righteousness- only the redeemed can perform.  Righteous deeds as a fruit of our right standing with God as his adopted children – Moral rectitude
12. Paul abolishes Pharisee’s concept of justification by law keeping
13. Our whole lives are changed and are being changed because of our relationship with Christ
14. Our justification required appeasement and propitiation (wrath bearing) which was fulfilled by Christ
15. Paul is asking the Galatians why they would want to go back when they experienced something better

 

Great Video

Video from KarmaTube

From the Westminster Larger Catechism

Q. 155. How is the Word made effectual to salvation?
A. The Spirit of God maketh the reading, but especially the preaching of the Word, an effectual means of enlightening,y convincing, and humbling sinners;z of driving them out of themselves, and drawing them unto Christ;a of conforming them to his image,b and subduing them to his will;c of strengthening them against temptations and corruptions;d of building them up in grace,e and establishing their hearts in holiness and comfort through faith unto salvation.f

(y) Neh 8:8; Acts 26:18; Ps 19:8
(z) 1 Cor 14:24-25; 2 Chr 34:18-19,26-28
(a) Acts 2:37,41; Acts 8:27-38
(b) 2 Cor 3:18; Col 1:27
(c) 2 Cor 10:4-6; Rom 6:17-18
(d) Eph 6:16-17; Col 1:28; Ps 19:11; Matt 4:4,7,10; 1 Cor 10:11
(e) Eph 4:11-12; Acts 20:32; 2 Tim 3:15-17
(f) Rom 16:25; 1 Thess 3:2,10-11,13; Rom 15:4